Readers Write: Turning our GN parks from green to brown

2
Readers Write: Turning our GN parks from green to brown

At the heart of the Great Neck Park District is the Village Green, a quiet, verdant space 100 years old. It represents a century of parkland donated, purchased and even swapped. All of it, all of our parks, have been left in our care. 

The Village Green is both too small and too steeped in history to be a victim of poor thinking. It has the Rose Garden, whose designer was of storied fame. It holds our community’s Veterans Memorial and a gazebo. It has a water fountain whose poignant past caused it to be filled in. It has a series of trees killed in a storm, their trunks given new life as sculptures in tribute to nature. On its fringe it has a latter-day children’s playground area, a popular place of happy activity. 

The Great Neck Park District believes in community service. So a resident spoke to a commissioner, and from that meager beginning it somehow grew into what we heard at a meeting on June 30: a percentage of the Village Green is to be carved out for a dog park. In other words, the commissioners are considering a plan to turn it brown.  

In the 1990s the park district purchased a defunct country club at the intersection of East Shore Road and Colonial Road and created a dog park, Peninsula Park. It was hailed by dog owners. Startup costs for purchase and refurbishment were a million dollars. That’s a hefty sunk cost.

Dog owners I spoke with recently had this to say about Peninsula Park: 

1.     It smells. It stinks.

2.     It has no sign.

3.     When owners with pooch passes go there, no park worker materializes to let them in.

4.     It has an abundance of poison ivy.

5.     There is no sidewalk by which to approach and enter.

From this we can conclude that before allocating dog acreage in other parks, the park district needs to show the community it can rejuvenate and maintain the one dog park it has. 

For example, remedy the absence of a sidewalk. Just as New York State established fire, water, water pollution control and park districts, it also created sidewalk districts, one of which oversaw the creation of the first sidewalks on Middle Neck Road. So our park district may have to take recourse to the commissioners of a somnolent sidewalk district, or to the trustees of a village, to address the need for a safe approach to that dog park by sidewalk. 

I’ve spoken to dog owners I know and asked why they were not at the meeting. They said they do not take their dogs to a dog park, and they gave reasons why not. So the statistical increase in dog ownership during the pandemic does not translate to a need for turning over additional park acreage to dogs.

The park district has titled its proposal for dog parks on the Village Green and at Allenwood Park a pilot program, saying it will be short-lived. Yet the Great Neck school district’s current universal pre-K started as a pilot program back in the 1950s, so the word pilot in no way promises something will go away. As it happens, the pre-K was worthy at the outset because it was years in the planning. By contrast, the proposed alterations to the Village Green and Allenwood Park include none of the usual research about impact on the community and its environs.  

A speaker at the meeting in favor of these takeovers of open space in two parks made it clear that he looks forward to this being only the beginning. He expects dog acreage in all the parks, great and small, in our Great Neck Park District: Steppingstone, Memorial Field, Parkwood, Allenwood, Cutter Mill, Grace Avenue/Firefighters, Lakeville, Manor, Ravine, Thomaston, Upland, Wyngate, Creek, Udall’s Pond Park, Woodland, Wooleys, plus Kings Point Park (which we have leased for 85 years), and the Village Green. 

Peninsula Park needs a clean bill of health. Meanwhile, this idea to withdraw park space from the Village Green and Allenwood Park needs to be recognized for what it is: a pilot program not ready for prime time.

Rebecca Rosenblatt Gilliar

Great Neck

No posts to display

2 COMMENTS

  1. As a 35+year resident of Great Neck I am sad to hear of this misrepresentation of the dog park. There are currently MANY dog owners who utilize and enjoy the park peacefully and respectfully. If anyone has ever been to Christopher Morley or even the newer dog run in Michael Tully, our dog park clearly outshines the former and is at least on par with the latter. Our park is not shiny and new, but it does a great job for its visitors.

    As for the arguments in the letter, I have the following responses:

    1. It smells. It stinks. – I have been utilizing this park for several years and have never experienced the “stink”.

    2. It has no sign. – This is not a reason not to design another park. There is no reason the signage cannot be improved concurrently.

    3. When owners with pooch passes go there, no park worker materializes to let them in. – A key has not been needed for several years. The gate requires a code for entry at the gate of the dog run. This code is provided during Pooch Pass registration at the Great Neck house. Therefore no park worker needs to be present for entry, this should have been explained to the dog owner. During the summer season there is a very dedicated worker who has been present for several years. He does a very good job maintaining the space, his name is Gary.

    4. It has an abundance of poison ivy. – Poison Ivy does not exist within the confines of the dog run. (Kings Point Park is completely covered in poison ivy.) This is not a reason not to run a pilot program, even if poison ivy was inside the dog run.

    5. There is no sidewalk by which to approach and enter. – The overwhelming majority of residents who I have met over the years are only able to reach the dog park by car. It is unfortunately, the only park space in Great Neck that welcomes dogs and they cannot reach it by foot, even if it had a sidewalk.

    Despite what some people are saying, it is not an underutilized space. This current dog park serves a wonderful group of residents who drive from all over Great Neck because they are desperate to have their dogs enjoy some space to run/play. I am a part of a messaging group of 55+ owners who coordinate their visits just to have dogs spend time with each other. I am also pleased to say that the owners I have encountered are always respectful and kind to each other despite having different life views outside of the dog park. We watch out for each other’s dogs and everyone cleans up after their dogs. Sure, there are improvements that could be made to all of our parks, but the 5 points above are not reasons a pilot program should not take place.

    As for why I didn’t attend the meeting, I was working late so I was unable to have my perspective represented.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here